This should translate to games like LoL, CS:GO, and DOTA 2 that are all flexible to handle lower power computers being playable as well. What I found was onboard performance was good enough to play older games like F1 2013 and tomb raider with the FPS being in the 30 FPS range. This was across a range of games from the past as well as a few new games mixed in as well. The rest of my testing was taking a look at actual in game performance. In Unigine Superposition the 630 based Intel CPUs are all grouped up and then again the 2400G is at nearly double that score. In both 3DMark tests, the two Raven Ridge CPUs are WAY ahead but you can see that the 9900K is slowly catching up to the 5775C, most likely because of overall CPU power. Here the 9900K came within a few FPS of all three of the 630 based CPUs and with the Intel 5775C and both of the Raven Ridge CPU ahead. My first test was the Cinebench R15 OpenGL benchmark. That said I did still test the 9900K in our onboard GPU test suite, just to be thorough. Not to mention that I don’t think anyone should be buying a high-end CPU only to use dedicated graphics, unless it is a workstation situation where you don’t need any gaming or GPU compute performance. It wasn’t amazing with the 7700k and that isn’t going to change with this launch. The integrated GPU on the i9-9900K isn’t any different than on the 8086K, 8700K, or even the 7700K. Okay so just to be completely upfront here.
0 kommentar(er)
